Saturday, February 26, 2011

TV Week in Review: 20th – 24th February

So, I went sort of wild with the reviewing this week. I don’t usually review all the shows I watch – laziness, and I still didn’t but twelve paragraphs is a lot for a lazy old me. There were some poor ones, but the good ones were excellent (I'm one week behind on Brothers & Sisters, I know)
           
Desperate Housewives: “Farewell Letter”
It’s so weird that one of the two pressing issues of the episode gets dovetailed into a sort of silly plot point – Keith is leaving. This is a shame actually, because I did love Brian Austin Green opposite Bree, maybe he’ll turn up again. Who knows? You’d think that they’d make this more important, but alas no. Keith’s child is in Florida, Bree refuses to moves and urges him to do so without her, because you can fall in and out of love with people but never with your children. It’s so weird that Bree, of all people, hasn’t fallen out of love with her children – they used to be absolute demons (and on that note, I miss Shawn Pyfrom). The only genuinely good storyline was Paul Young’s drama. I for one am happy to see Cody Kasch back (one of the reasons for the epic brilliance of season one) – and he looks so old and non-creepy now. The final blowout between Paul and Zack, and then Beth and Paul were both well played which makes me wonder how interesting a show a spinoff about Paul would have been since Cherry keeps reverting to the same old storylines with the actual main characters of the show (robbing them of much significance). You have to wonder where Beth is going to go now. It’ll be sad to see Emily Bergl leave the show (she’s turned into such an asset), but she probably won’t officially leave until the end of the season. I wonder if she’ll team up with her insane mother again...that could be interesting...
[C+]
           
Brothers & Sisters: “The One That Got Away”
Balthazar Getty is not my favourite actor on the show, but I didn’t realise how much I missed him until now. True, he doesn’t get the A storyline here, but watching him interact with the cast (especially Griffiths) makes me remember why I used to love this show, way back when. It’s not perfect this episode, but it is interesting. I’m still vaguely annoyed at how redundant a character Justin has turned into, and the presence of Giles Marini continues to exasperate me. It seems like such a colossal waste having Anable’s sole contribution of the episode be ways to help Giles be romantic. Ugh. Still, the A-plot of Sarah’s paternity, though a little too deliberate, does work well – even if I miss Kitty. I wasn’t as sold on the issues of Saul and Jonathan, but it’s not as cringe worthy as you could expect. What’s more, the second half of the episode gets better and makes good on what could have been turgid storylines for the most part.
[B]

Big Love: “D.I.V.O.R.C.E”
Let me just say, power to Chloe Sevigny for churning out a brilliant performance this episode. Sure, it was more of a sidelining supporting than a co-lead – but I can’t complain, and the episode was something good, too. With only four episodes to go, I really have no idea where the show is going to go – and I have this awful feeling that somebody’s going to end up dead. Ugh, me and my active imagination. Bill and Barb are drifting further and further apart, and it’s a bit unfortunate because you can understand where both parties are coming from. That final scene with the wives, Bill, Barb’s mom and the "lesbian" (too funny) was something special and a perfect close to the episode (and Jeanne, too, offers up a fine performance this episode). I’ll admit that I don’t like the idea of Cara Lynn falling for her teacher or Ben falling for Rhonda – both of those liaisons just seem weird, in addition to be being all wrong. Nicki was responsible for the best moments, though. Watching her trying to understand Cara Lynn’s math was a beautiful moment and that blow-up with Barb and Bill about the “finances” was well played. There again, you get where Barb is coming from, but it’s difficult not to feel a little badly for Nicki. I don’t want this season (and thus, the show) to end. I’m going to miss these characters.
[B+/A-]
            
Glee“Blame it on the Alcohol”
I don’t know what it is, definitively – was I so worried about Glee tackling alcoholism that my low expectations turned the episode into even more of a delight? I’d hate to think so, but either way this is easily the best episode of the back half of Season Two – and for the oddest of reasons. There was a surprising lack of pretentiousness in the way that they decided to let the students go full out drunk which made the inevitable moral at the end a whole lot less preachy than you’d have expected. Brennan doesn’t get enough praise for his writing credits, and it’s impressive how the arcs all coalesce. Sue goading Will into drunkenness isn’t exactly inspired – but Sue publicly humiliating him was priceless. Not because I don’t love Will (sorry, Ryan, I do) but because Jane is the queen of deadpan humour – and Becky Johnson is awesome. Then, there’s Rachel who was all around great in this episode: from the headband, to the bantering with Puck and then the Blaine issue. Each time I think I’ll let up on Kurt he pulls something ridiculous, case in point: this episode where his melodrama is evident twice. Even though the ending was a bit too pat, Blaine’s conversation with him was a smart move in highlighting hypocrisy, though I’m not sure if they get how hypocritical he was being towards his dad – who’s just trying to do what any sane parent would do (avoid their teenager having drunken sex). I’m neither here nor there on the ultimate payoff – it’s a bit too pat having the issue raised turn into a non-entity, which left a vaguely bitter taste in my mouth. Still, who knew “Blame it on the Alcohol” could make for a great group number?
[B+/A-]
      

Parenthood: “Never Sleep With Your Autistic Nephew's Therapist”
Oh, Crosby just stepped in it – did he not? The thing is, I’m not his biggest fan but I feel he’s getting the short end of the stick, especially in relation to Adam who’s even more judgemental than Kristina with the issue. We get that he’s worried about Max, but it’s a bit unfortunate that Crosby will be getting 0 supporting from his older brother. I love everything about Sydney, Julia and Joel (even if I miss them having an actual A plot) so Sydney’s vegetarian stint was fun to watch. More important, though, watching Connie and Zeek bond was just great. Again, I say Bedelia is such a great actor who makes do with her minuscule amount of screen times. I love the Amber and Drew sibling pairing, so their issues were well received and I’m so glad that Sarah actually stepped up in the parenting department. I don’t feel as if Amber should feel badly for laying into Seth, but I guess you have to choose your battles. I don’t know how Max will react to having Asperser’s and I don’t know what will happen with Jasmine and Crosby (hopefully, they don’t breakup) – but it’s a more than solid episode.
[B+]


Modern Family: “Regrets Only”
I’m not sure if I prefer this episode to last week’s but it easily wins points for being excellently written. We get three converging storylines which actually do justice to each of the main relationships in the show. It’s all fuelled by Claire and Phil’s marital issues which are just hilarious without being contrived. I really do love watching Ty and Julie opposite each other – easily one of TV’s best married couples. This interacts with Gloria and Jay and Cam and Mitchell, both of them having issues with communication. Stonestreet doesn’t exactly wow me (he’s #6 of the six principals) and he doesn’t exactly shine in this episode – but it’s so much fun watching him mug the camera especially in Cam’s interactions with Luke. Gloria shows up for a few moments to be absolutely ridiculous, and what’s more the children are shirked in this episode. Watching the Dunphy girls be silly is always appreciated and we still manage great random moments like Claire getting her massage at the mall or Luke’s stupidity. The second half of season two is looking much better than the first half.
[A/A-]
     
Community: “Into to Political Science”
I wasn’t crazy enough to think that Community was going to offer up another near perfect episode like last week’s instalment – and they didn’t. But, I wouldn’t call it regression. It’s not a brilliant episode, but it’s infinitely better than the first half of the season – though some of the gags don’t soar as well. They’re back to their on-the-nose yarns and Jeff and Annie getting into a political battle is nice to watch, even if wrapping it up with Jeff’s audition for “The Real World” didn’t impress as much as I think it was supposed to. The other significant arc was a dual one: Troy trying to come to grips – somewhat – with Abed’s “faux” life and Abed and the secret agent. The Troy stuff delivers; the other portion? Not so much. Glover and Pudi are great together, but the secret service is just a little too pat – even if the closing gag was a beaut.
[B]

The Office: “Todd Packer”
The main arc of Packer’s return fell flat, the suplot of Pam and Andy and Jim and Dwight were both brilliant. We’re preparing for Michael’s departure and this episode felt way too much like a filler episode. Yes, Amy Ryan continues to be one of the shining stars in the show (oh lord, PLEASE let get that Emmy nod). It sucks, in a way, that Jenna Fischer hasn’t gotten much material this season but she’s working with what she has and I especially loved the closing with her and Darryl – she’s so much fun when given the chance. See how little I have to say about the episode? Not bad, but unsubstantial.
[B-]

Parks & Recreation: “Indianapolis”
Dear Parks & Recreation Department: why are you so continually brilliant? In some ways this episode shouldn’t turn out so great because the set-up seems decidedly mundane even for the Parks&Rec crew, but it ends up being so delightfully sanguine and irresistible only reaffirming the notion that this is the best comedy on television at the moment. I love how subtle the entire arc about Ben finding friends in the department was delivered, all the while underscored by Tom and his ridiculous ambitions. I’m really not that invested in Andy and April, but their “first date” was excellent – going around trying to get free stuff. And the fact that it ended with them giving all the money away was just perfect. Then, there’s Ron and his beloved steak – a plotpoint that Nick Offerman sold time and time again, and of course Ann and her breakup with Chris (which I hope is temporary). And then it wraps up with a montage of Leslie giving us some of the worse ways to get dumped which mirrors Poehler’s brilliant comedic timing from “The Hunting Trip” last season. Why, oh why, is this show so great?
[A/A-]
         
30 Rock: “TGS Hates Women”
This episode is a trick one, it’s coming off a couple of top-notch episodes and there’s a moment at the end with the big reveal with the new writer on TGS that’s ridiculous – and not in the usual good way, but then there are some great things too. The issues with TGS hating women are far from riveting, but to an extent it works, especially when you remember how brilliant Krakowski and Fey are opposite each other – when given the chance. Moretz and Baldwin seemed to be a tad too trite, until that showdown at the end which we sort of should have seen coming – and it sets itself up for something good. It’s sort of uneven in the way it delivers on the jokes – but it’s a fair episode, and I’ll take it.
[B/B+]

Grey’s Anatomy: “Not Responsible”
There’s plot development, but the episode feels far from earnest. I surely don’t mind having Loretta Devine back, and Meredith dealing with her eyesight is interesting – if vaguely silly. The fact that I have to think so heavily for an episode I saw so recently probably means that it didn’t have that much to offer. It was an episode of moments, though. Watching Mark, Owen and Derek playing golf on the rooftop was brilliant. Seeing Bailey getting through to the Chief about his wife? Perfect. Everything involving Alex, Cristina and Meredith (together and separate) was so evocative of early seasons. I’m not sure I care for April and Dr. Stark, and though I hate that Arizona and Callie keep having these roadblocks that’s an arc worth looking into. Jackson and Lexie? I don’t care for them. But eh, it’s fine.
[B-]

Private Practice: “Two Steps Back”
It’s so weird having episodes of the show without Addison, but it’s a generally solid effort all round. Liza Weil (of Gilmore Girls’ fame) appears as a patient who may or may not have dissociative disorder. It’s an interesting arc in itself, even if the payoff seems a bit obvious from a mile away it actually manages to work. This arc develops against three others – Sam and Naomi working with a mother who’s teenager daughter with Downs’ may or may not be pregnant, Cooper and Charlotte in therapy and Violet’s (apparently slanderous) novel-to-be. I’m all for any arc with Audra, and though it’s not exactly a piece-de-resistance, it’s an interesting dilemma and one that’s handled with more realism than you’d expect. Cooper and Charlotte have problems that seem rote, but actually end up interestingly and even if Violet’s dilemma is silly it does lead to some nice moments with the entire group (sans Addison) playing off each other – which are always some of the best parts of the show.
[B/B+]
         
Interesting Things
  • Honestly, why are Lynette’s children so retarded (excuse the political incorrectness)? It’s borderline ridiculous, and not even in a funny way. Absolutely weird.
  • Why does Alby have to be so creepy? Is it the hair? And that kiss between he and Verlan – good lord, that was sort of disturbing – no?
  • I swear, every time Gloria and Phil have scenes together I die inside. Vergara and Burrell are so fun together.
  • Who didn’t the reveal with Chris and the pink razor coming a mile away? I loved Lowe’s line-reading of “I’m human. I have blemishes.”
  • More than ever, this week I really felt like Audra and Taye were going to break into song on the balcony. Oy.
  • Don’t Mae Whitman and Lauren Graham show their emotion (with reference to physicality) in the same way? They’re such a good mother/daughter pair.
          
Standout Writing
Modern Family: A/A-
Parks & Recreation: A-
Big Love: A-
Glee: B+
         
Standout Performances
Julie Bowen in Modern Family: A
Chloe Sevigny in Big Love: A-
Nick Offerman in Parks & Recreation: A-
Lea Michele in Glee: B+/A-
Adam Scott in Parks & Recreation B+/A-
Jane Krakowski in 30 Rock: B+
Amy Poehler in Parks & Recreation: B+
Jeanne Tripplehorn in Big Love: B+

                     
What stood out this past week in TV for you?

Encore Awards: Picture

I contemplated doing a top ten lists of 2010 films which would have sufficed as proof of my favourites, but I’m not if not set in my ways and that seems much to imitative of the Academy’s recent return to nominating ten films for the honour – so I opted not to (not that this is actually cause for concern, but allow me my pretentiousness) – I went for an even more atypical top 7 instead. By now you’re probably tired of me telling you that 2009 had better films to offer us than 2010 and if I were to line-up my two top ten lists of the two years three 2010 films would make it into the combined ten. That doesn’t lessen my appreciation for the films I like this year – they’re still good. I haven’t found anything to fawn over embarrassingly like Bright Star or pontificate on continuously (and superfluously) like An Education but I do have one film at the top and a trio immediately after that’s difficult to separate. And the also-rans are in no way substandard. (All Awards)

When I think of my first impressions of some of these films, the results are kind of interesting. But, movie loving is a strange thing. Some of these films improve significantly on multiple viewings (The King's Speech, Scott Pilgrim vs the World) and some of them lose a bit of their lustre (The Social Network). The film I've seen most this year is The Kids Are All Right - and each time I see it, something new appears for me to love. Ah, le cinema....

(unless otherwise indicated, click on the photos for reviews)
                  
THE NOMINEES
Agora
In its way Agora is just the sort of film that makes sense on my list of personal favourites. I’m as keenly aware of its issues as any of its detractors – well, except for Jose, even I can’t defend it from the tongue-lashing he gave it – but Amenabar’s pseudo-historical saga appeals to me not only on a social level but artistically. True, its technical achievements are impressive, and maybe there’s something in it being the first A (well, A-) that I gave this year. At its strongest moments, though, no other drama this year – not even The Social Network – is able to marry intelligence with entertainment so sumptuously. And, I’ll always credit it for making me appreciate the ellipse which I was never half as interested in when I was actually studying Technical Drawing.

Animal Kingdom
I’m anxiously waiting what Michôd’s next cinematic encounter entails. Perhaps, Animal Kingdom shouldn’t work as well as it does – and a throwaway description of it I heard (an Australian, small-scale GoodFellas) made me wonder if it’s all really as rote as that. Still, when it comes to being seamless in blending acting, direction and writing Michôd’s work here is astounding. It approaches the bleak issues with a freshness – that’s not delusion – and manages to suggest interesting things about potential archetypes with smart profundity.
                        
                            
The Kids Are All Right
Detractors seem taken with the notion that the work is not laudable because the story is a normal suburban one with lesbians – no kidding. The very point of The Kids Are All Right IS the rote ways of suburban life, Paul is a mere plot point (albeit a nice, juicy one) and Choledenko knows to create the tone that makes the film dependant on its familial issues and not its LGBT themes. It’s a bit insular to boil it down to holding merit for the way that that ends up being so progressive; its strongest asset is its non-judgemental attitude toward its entire cast. It’s the sort of film that’s a bit like an arbitrary voyeuristic glimpse into the lives of a group of flawed individuals.
                                                                 
                                             
The King’s Speech
When you get past the fact that The King’s Speech isn’t what you expect it to be, the tale that Hooper crafts is comforting in its stylish sedateness. The amalgamation of everything that makes it thoroughly British (even if in an ostensibly formulaic way) is stimulating to watch as Hooper and Seiberg use the conventionality to create something subtly imaginative. I don’t care if it’s technical aspects have (unfortunately) turned into something of a joke recently, but it’s the sort of subtle camerawork and editing that’s always impressive and what’s more it emerges as one of the most well paced cinematic experiences of the year.
                                                               
Rabbit Hole
One of the strangest things about Rabbit Hole is how much we manage to learn in a mere hour and a half. Neither Lindsay-Abaire nor Mitchell is willing to waste time on the extraneous and they make each minute contribute to a consistent movement forward that’s deliberate (though, never forced) and organic always in its progress. I’d never call it overwrought because despite its emotive potential there’s a sort of sheen preventing it from being too interested in the hypersensitivity of dealing with death and more involved in the detachment Becca and Howie feel from the world. Mitchell echoes it in his directing, and Lindsay-Abaire ensures that it wraps up concisely – but not with an obtrusive ribbon to tie it off.
                       
Scott Pilgrim vs the World
No movie this year puts a perpetual smile on my face as much as Scott Pilgrim vs the World (yes, I’m in lesbians with it). It’s continually daring without any arrogance about it, and in its somewhat single-minded desire to entertain us it never robs its characters of their integrity. A videogame geek, I am not, but I feel affronted on its behalf for being relegated to mere “dabbling” in technological innovations. Wright’s dedication to story and characters triumphs over a number of the more non-comic films of the year, and he approaches his subjects with a dearth of pretentiousness that even more of them could benefit from.
                            
The Social Network
Amidst the barrage of Oscar prognosticating and choosing sides that’s happening online, it’s difficult to remember where your allegiances lay in the first place. The staunchest of supporters for The Social Network supporters have turned into a mean crowd, but that won’t make me waver in my appreciation for it. Rabbit Hole wins in the succinct department, but The Social Network emits a smoothness to it that’s never smarmy – no matter. Fincher’s directing style is not exactly personal, but his intent on coalescing technical aspects with the insularity of his protagonist is impressive. Add that to the fact that for every pithy bit of dialogue that makes you start, there’s an equally intelligent scene that makes you think.
                        
FINALISTS: The Ghost Writer (review) tops my other list, and true there’s a delicate divide preventing me from surrendering completely to it. Despite the slightest of reservations, though, Polanski’s control over the story is excellent and a seamless screenplay merging with a talented cast makes for a rousing, intelligent but always entertaining thriller; Somewhere is a more dubious choice – ostensibly, I suppose – but I might even intimate that it’s my favourite piece from Coppola. It depends resolutely on her ability to retract the sometimes officious hand of the director and let the film just exist in its natural state culminating in an indolence that’s not overly stylised but still sophisticated and most important emotionally motivating.
                          
SEMI-FINALISTS: They’re all worth your time for various reasons like The Fighter (review) for its ultimate focus on familial relationships and issues of self all under the smokescreen of a boxing film; Greenberg (review) for being so continuously smart in examining the misanthropic tendencies of a man simultaneously hateful of the universe and desperate for appreciation; Nowhere Boy (review) for managing to have that many obvious clichés in its pockets but still – in the end – managing to be refreshing in its focus not on Lennon but a troubled teenager; Let Me In (review) for taking the horror genre and moving it from the obtrusive to the psychological all the while never exploiting its young leads.

#14: Cairo Time (review)
#15: Shutter Island  (review)
#16: The Runaways (review)
#17: How to Train Your Dragon (review)
#18: Blue Valentine (review)
#19: Black Swan (review)
#20: Get Low (review)
#21: Green Zone (review)
#22: Night Catches Us (review)
#23: Toy Story III (review)
#24: Nanny McPhee & the Big Bang (review)
#25: Winter’s Bone (review) 
  

Nomination Tally (24 Categories, some miscellaneous some not)
127 Hours  1 nomination
Agora 10 nominations (1 Gold, 3 Silvers)
Alice in Wonderland 1 nomination (1 Gold)
Animal Kingdom 9 nominations (3 Silvers)
Black Swan 6 nomination (1 Gold)
Blue Valentine 1 nomination (1 Silver)
Brooklyn’s Finest 1 nomination
Burlesque 2 nomination (1 Silver)
Country Strong 1 nomination (1 Gold)
The Fighter 3 nominations (1 Silver)
For Colored Girls 3 (1 Silver)
The Ghost Writer 7 nominations (2 Golds, 3 Silvers)
Greenberg 1 nomination
Green Zone 1 nomination
Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows 2 nominations
Inception 4 nominations (1 Silver)
The Kids Are All Right 10 nominations (4 Golds, 1 Silvers)
The King’s Speech 9 nominations (1 Silver)
Let Me In 2 nominations
Mother & Child 2 nominations
Nanny McPhee & the Big Bang 1 nomination
Never Let Me Go 2 nominations
Nowhere Boy 2 nominations (1 Silver)
Rabbit Hole 11 nominations (5 Golds, 1 Silvers)
Robin Hood 1 nomination
The Runaways 1 nomination (1 Gold)
Scott Pilgrim vs the World 9 nominations (1 Gold, 2 Silvers)
Shutter Island 7 nominations (3 Golds, 3 Silvers)
The Social Network 13 nominations (4 Gold, 1 Silver)
Somewhere 2 nominations
Tangled 1 nomination
True Grit 1 nomination
           
There, free at last – I am – my 25 favourite films of 2010. What do you think of my ragtag collection of picks? Snap decisions: how was 2010 in film for you?

Friday, February 25, 2011

Oscar Talk: Actor and Actress

I often wonder why the actor and actress categories are considered superior to the supporters, but judging by the nominees this year I’d actually support that theory. The nominees for the leading categories significantly outweigh the supporting players.
            
ACTOR
Who’d have thought that Colin Firth would be the thespian to reach here before his contemporaries like Neeson, Branagh and Fiennes – but, that’s Oscar for you. He gets an immediate second shot at gold over last year’s loss, and he’s not likely to lose.

NOMINEES: Javier Bardem in Biutiful / Jeff Bridges in True Grit / Jesse Eisenberg in The Social Network / Colin Firth in The King’s Speech / James Franco in 127 Hours Prediction: Colin Firth Alternate Javier Bardem

I should probably qualify that alternate prediction by saying that of all the feature film categories this is the one where I believe an upset is likely. Still, at this rate, if any upset were to occur it would be one of catastrophic proportions – and who better than the man who turned into (somewhat) of an upset nominee. Analysing the field, on performances, I’d say that the prize is between Eisenberg and Firth so I don’t mind that Firth has sort of swept through the season, even if some deserving men got no love (my ballot). I never actually considered Sean Penn’s Milk to be an upset, the last real “surprise” this category saw was Adrien Brodey, but parallels between he and Eisenberg are tenuous at best. It’s Colin’s race.
         
ACTRESS
Logically, I shouldn’t be getting any sort of headache with the prediction for this category because Natalie has sort of swept through the season, well the majors anyway – but I’m still not absolutely certain that she’s the indisputable winner. Hell, it’s possible that I’ll see her on stage with the winning statuette and still doubt the veracity of her frontrunner status – I’m sort of ridiculous like that. I was depending on the BAFTA to give Annette the statue, and prove my theory whereby the Annette/Natalie race would turn into a converse version of the Marion/Julie race (both win Globes, one wins SAG and the other wins BAFTA) – but alas, I was wrong. Logically, if Annette had any hope you’d expect her to take at least one major from Natalie – but other than the surprise British Critics' win (which isn’t exactly a major) she's got nothing. And she still lost the BAFTA, so there’s no proof that she has the British voting bloc behind her.
           
NOMINEES: Annette Bening in The Kids Are All Right Nicole Kidman in Rabbit Hole / Jennifer Lawrence in Winter’s Bone / Natalie Portman in Black Swan / Michelle Williams in Blue Valentine

Prediction: Natalie Portman Alternate: Annette Bening

So, I’m predicting Natalie – which makes me feel a little bit like a Judas because I still think that Annette can win this. I’ve never been one to have ridiculous Oscar hopes (I gave up on Cate winning for I’m Not There even before Tilda t urned into the frontrunner) but I’m just getting a feeling, heaven knows what it is. (Really, though, how ironic is it that a win for Annette would be an upset – mindboggling, some.) So, Natalie’s my prediction with Annette as my alternate. You all know what I’m hoping for, though....(my picks)
         
How ridiculous are my great expectations of an Annette win? Who wants an upset in the Actor category?

Baby Gaga a Breast Milk ice cream

Have you had enough vanilla ice cream or any other fruit flavored ice cream? How bout an ice cream that's not just delicious but also nutritious. Baby Gaga, a break milk ice cream will one of these days reach our salivating mouth.

2 facts we have to see first, ice cream is certified delicious;breast (yes, human) milk absolutely full of nutrients and healthy to newly born child. Given the facts, lets add Gaga, she's so famous now and I could compare her to Madonna during her reigning decade.

Now, about the Baby Gaga, it's human breast milk might not be that appealing but the "treat" will go on sale Friday, according to BBC.

The Baby Gaga ice cream is being serve in a restaurant located in Covent Garden in London. The ice cream was created by mixing the milk with Madagascan vanilla pods and lemon zest and churning into ice cream.

Here's what icecreamists founder Matt O'Connor said in an advert appealing for breast milk donations and believes his new recipe will be a success.

"What's the harm in using my assets for a bit of extra cash?"

"If it's good enough for our children, it's good enough for the rest of us," he said.

"Some people will hear about it and go yuck - but actually it's pure organic, free-range and totally natural."

Donors like Mrs Hiley gets £15 for every 10 ounces of milk from the company. Mrs Hiley said it was a great "recession beater" and added "What's the harm in using my assets for a bit of extra cash?".

"I teach women how to get started on breastfeeding their babies. There's very little support for women and every little helps."

Chuck Lorre on Two and a Half Men cancelled

After the Two and a Half Men cancelled, Chuck Lorre could be answering Charlie Sheen's challenged to fight him in an octagon match. Chuck Lorre's posted a picture of his knuckle to his blog.

Chuck Lorre, producer of Big Bang Theory, Grace Under Fire and Cybill, Dharma & Greg decided that Two and a Half Men cancelled after Charlie went on rant.
chuck lorre


Meanwhile, here's Chuck Lorre's post from his blog.
It was more fun writing these things when I was fairly certain no one was reading them. That is no longer the case. These days it seems like every vanity card is getting scrutinized and criticized by network executives, corporate legal departments and publicity departments, TV journalists and tabloid bloggers. Believe it or not, my musings have been both cheered and jeered by TV Guide! But lately it's gotten out of hand. Which is why I've decided to take a break for a few weeks. Let things cool off a little. Instead of writing short essays that upset people, I've decided to use my one second of network TV to do something simple and hassle-free. Starting with this card, I'm going to display a photograph of a part of my body that is entirely innocuous. No longer will I share some troublesome piece of my mind. Now I will share an actual piece of Chuck that is incapable of offending anyone. You know, a foot, a hand, or maybe a toe. So with that in mind, behold...
Chuck Lorre's few weeks break could give him a breath and freely decided if he will really finalize his decision Two and a Half Men cancelled.

Flashback: Airport

Thanks to Walter for tacitly encouraging me to revisit Airport with his Casting Coup dedicated to recasting the 1970 blockbuster (Tilda, Rosamund and Melissa Leo casted to perfection – that’s a remake I’d be on board with). I’ve heard more than a few people call out the ridiculousness of an Academy where something as trifling as Airport earned 12 nominations, but you have to admit that it’s not exactly devoid of technical innovation and it’s important to examine these multiple nominees in context of the offerings of films that year. It’s often so deprecatingly referred to as the “disaster” movie and the spoof Airplane! doesn’t exactly help it’s cause, but it’s a bit unfair to think of Airport against those publically conscious films of its era like Taxi Drive or All the President’s Men. You can’t conceivably expect every film to have a grand message to offer, and it’s even disingenuous to think lesser of a film that doesn’t.
It would probably go without saying that Airport doesn’t examine all the facets of the novel – but I do think that it’s one of the smartest adaptations of the genre. Hailey’s original novel is permeated with such an air of confusion – it’s one of those “big” novels where every character that appears on the page has something important to say. Cinematic entities don’t have that luxury and though George Seaton doesn’t thrive on the movement between characters like Altman or even Soderbergh, he deserves credit. Airport has a number of good – occasionally great – performances, but it’s a director’s movie. One of those films, like Avatar (if you will) that sort of encapsulate the fact that cinema’s a visual medium. I’m especially glad that got notices for its editing and sound, the latter of which is the more obvious nomination but the former being just as good. It doesn’t strike that veritable chord of “prestige” flick – it’s probably more of a Bourne Identity than a United 93 if we’re using Greengrass as a model.

And, yet, in the space of that Airport has those performances on its side. More than just good performances, it’s the good female performances that always jump out at me. I’ll come out and say that I think Jean Seberg (offensive wig, aside) is great as Tanya. Truth is, I’d swap her for one of the actual supporting actress nominees from the film, but more on that soon. She and Lancaster have the perfect rapport to ground the film against all the madness going on. I always feel badly that she never managed to turn into a bigger actress – she gives me a Marlene Dietrich vibe, and that’s never a bad thing. I’d not have given Helen Hayes that Oscar, and I won’t have nominated her either. I won’t deny that she’s fine in her role and absolutely hilarious but in the face of the vastly superior Stapleton (who at the time had yet to win her Oscar) it’s a shame she took home the Oscar. Jacqueline Bisset is another rarely remembered performance who’s quite good. The role has more significance in the novel, and Bisset plays it with a profundity that’s unexpected.

Like any good disaster movie you know that whatever the catastrophe, the most significant characters need not fear much – and it’s not an indication of Airport’s faults. Fun would be the wrong word to call it, but it sure is an entertaining one. I’m neither here nor there on it gargantuan Oscar success (nomination wise, at least) but that doesn’t really matter. It would be a bit insular, even for me, to think of it only in relation to its worth in the Oscar catalogue. Airport’s a good one.
          
Have you seen Seaton’s flick? Stapleton or Hayes for the win? Any fans of Seberg?

Thursday, February 24, 2011

“You just don’t like him. You don’t like it that he uses a ballpoint pen; you don’t like it that he takes three lumps of sugar in his tea. You don’t like it that he likes Frosty the Snowman and you are letting that convince you of something terrible, just terrible.”
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...