Showing posts with label Judy Garland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judy Garland. Show all posts

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Encore’s Birthday Marathon: Day 9

I was listening to Rufus Wainwright’s Carnegie Hall Judy Garland Concert last weekend. I’m not the biggest Wainwright fan, but he’s a great songwriter, he’s got a good voice but his secret weapon is his humour. He’s just hilarious in concert. The thing is, I’m not altogether infatuated with Judy, really. I like her, she’s so naturally convivial that I can’t imagine anyone not liking her. Still, as much as I love her musical oeuvre in classics like The Wizard of Oz and A Star is Born I don’t ever rush out to see a film just because she’s in it. Strangely, too, my favourite of her is the non-singing, non-dancing work she does in Stanley Kramer’s Judgment at Nuremberg, go figure.
    
The reason I bring up Judy is because I recently watched Easter Parade (somewhat trite, but generally enjoyable) and it got me to thinking about films of the era, well MGM musicals to be exact. I’m a somewhat reticent fan of the musical genre, but MGM musicals are one (of my many) cinematic blind spots. Of course, it’s because that whole period from the 30s to the 50s is a bit like a blind spot for me and I don’t know if it’s because of lack of chance or lack of interest. I confess that I like Fred Astaire more than Gene Kelly, but it’s a bit like deciding that I like Todd Fields more than Todd Haynes. I like them both (Field a bit more), but I don’t go crazy over either. School’s as good as out for me (one more insufferable exam to go) and I think the holidays will be as good a time as any to get acquainted with those lost years. Sure, I’ve seen almost every Katharine Hepburn film form the era, but almost everything else is fair game – well, the musicals seem “fairer” than anything else.
           
What do you think of the 30s-50s in cinema? Which films (or musicals) stand out?
       
(More on the birthday marathon.)

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Encore’s Birthday Marathon: Day 1

I’m generally cagey about my birthday. I’m not wary of revealing my age, I just don’t like birthdays generally and mine specifically. I’ll agree with Ron Swanson and say that birthdays were a conspiracy created by Hallmark to sell cards. Still, I’m all for increasing productivity on the blog at the moment so I’m celebrating that impending day with a blogging marathon – 20 days of cinematic reminiscing ending on my 20th birthday. It’s really just a series of non-chronological vicissitudes from yours truly in what will just function as me at my most unhinged – which is all the time. Who knows? I might end it all with that notoriously overdue review of The English Patient. Maybe.
            
So, what for today? I was ruminating on cinematic firsts and I’m still not absolutely certain as to the veracity of the forthcoming statement but I’m generally sure that The Wizard of Oz was the first feature that I saw. As I said, I’m not 100% certain but I’ll stick with it simply because I seem to have it on a loop when it comes to childhood memories and even if it wasn’t the FIRST movie I saw I like to think of it as a perfect encapsulation of that tenuous bond between childhood fantasies and adult realities. 
I remember when I had that musical blog-a-thon last year (it seems so much more recent, though) Reuben wrote a hilarious piece on the underlying sinister nature to the film and it made me think of how important perspective.
         
When I watched it again, earlier this year, with my nephew the cynicism of it all seemed to leap off screen. Now, I don’t know if it’s because reading Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the East is begging me to look at it all with new eyes but Burke’s Glinda’s saccharine nature is all the more off-putting now that I reconcile her with that almost condescendingly sweet smile. It’s probably proof of age making me more jaded, but I’m also less willing to buy the logic of her plot (yes, plot) to keep Dorothy in Oz until she realises that she can leave whenever she wishes to.
          
I’m wont to keep nitpicking until we turn to Dorothy because, like my childhood counterpart, I’m still wholly enamoured with her. It’s another reason I’d buy the possibility of it being my first film, because Dorothy Gale is sort of imprinted in my memory; no, not the image of her and her shoes but the image of her first act of theft which is terribly arbitrary.
       
It’s impossibly random, but that image of Dorothy’s first theft act has stuck with me for some time. Not bad as far as cinematic firsts, I suppose.

Monday, January 10, 2011

Music Break [...with Chris Colfer, Judy Garland, Patti LuPone, Audra McDonald, Lea Michele & Barbra Streisand]

I’m feeling fairly out of it today, so what’s a better antidepressant than good music?

First up, Lea Michele and Chris Colfer in the best duet in the episode "Duets". I still wouldn't call myself a fan of Kurt, but this is lovely.

Then there's the absolutely resplendent Audra McDonald teaming up with Patti Lupone. I don't care for Patti, but Audra is amazing and they song brilliant together.

And of course, the iconic original - Barbra and Judy.

Okay, as you were (Good morning).

Friday, September 3, 2010

The Judy Garland Show, A Meme (sort of)

Joe asked me to start a meme about Judy. I’m about memed out as it is – so definitely no thirty day memes in the near future for me. but I decided on a one-shot dedicated to Judy.
            
“Judy Does Drama”
Which dramatic scene of hers sticks in your mind?
        
“Judy Does Pretty”
Where was she too gorgeous for words?

“Judy Does Singing”
Which number of hers comes to mind first?

“Judy’s Iconic”
Which role has her name stamped over it?
             
“Judy’s Greatest”
What was her greatest film?
       
Continue the MEME if you like...

Friday, June 4, 2010

Follow the Yellow, Brick Road – A Few Short Notes, No Digressions

I didn’t cover The Wizard of Oz on Sunday – because it’s not my absolutely favourite musical – it’s the ever dreaded #2. Jose and Ruben both looked deeper into the classic spotting things that had never occurred. Of course, that’s one of the main indicators that a film is excellent – when you can keep returning to it and finding new things. The thing is, I often forget that the The Wizard of Oz is a musical. It’s not that the songs are poor, headlined by the class “Over the Rainbow” and backed up with sweet tunes like “If I Were the King of the Forest” and “If I Only Had A Brain” it is just as fulfilling in its moments of adventure as it is in its moments of music. What I remember The Wizard of Oz for most is the one thing that has been borrowed by countless story tellers (on film and otherwise) – our hero’s departure to a strange, new world that turns out to be a dream. Incidentally this running gag is the weakest part of The Wizard of Oz’s strong story, but all things considered it’s only weak by comparison and it’s only lost its brilliance today because of our overexposure to it.
The Wizard of Oz is one of the films I remember earliest from my childhood. I can’t recall the exact age, but I know I saw it when it had all switched to Technicolor. Upon my “discovery” of the earlier sepia toned portion I found myself more charmed by Dorothy’s adventures (or lack thereof) in Kansas. She’s obviously out of place, and it made me realise how important this portion is to her “development”, and I couldn't help but smile every time Judy said "Oh, Aunty Em" in that earnest way of hers. The Wizard of Oz is doing so much even though it seems like a standard home, away and back home story. I always marvel at Judy’s ability to be meek while still having a sort of bravura that’s most attractive. She has a thing for line readings, even at that age, and sure she spends a significant portion of the film admonishing the things she meets it’s never too much. Of course Dorothy’s growing dissatisfaction with Oz is key to the message the story has to tell us. It’s part of the weirdness of the entire film though. Sure, the Wicked Witch of the East is evil and all, but the celebration is almost perverse as we watch those crazy Munchkins rejoicing.
It’s nice that The Wizard of Oz has endured for so long. As much as I love Shirley Temple I balk at the idea of her as Dorothy. It’s a little gem, that works as much for the adult as for the child – and that’s a bit of a rarity. It’s #19 on my list of favourite films.

Saturday, April 3, 2010

Judgment at Nuremberg

Wilder and Lemmon had their thing, Kazan had Brando, Cukor had Kate, Scorsese had DeNiro and then DiCaprio and Stanley Kramer had Spencer Tracy. Being the benevolent man I’ve heard, Spencer Tracy probably thanked heavens for Stanley Kramer. An excellent actor when given the chance, no other director has consistently pulled greatness out of Spencer. From Guess Who’s Coming Dinner, to Inherit the Wind and this magnum opus Judgment At Nuremberg. Although Inherit the Wind is my favourite stand alone Tracy performance, I always return to Judgment at Nuremberg when I think of the good work the two have done together. Sure it got steamrolled by West Side Story, and all (undeservedly in a few categories) but I still remember Judgment at Nuremberg, fondly (well as fond as you can think of a film so harrowing). It should be ranked atop the list of great films with all those other classics of the era.
                   
The thing is though, I can wax on for pages about Spencer’s excellence – I’m an ardent admirer; but as brilliant as he is here it’s Maximilian Schell that deserves effusive praise. This would probably rank high on a list of Oscar shockers. I’m not sure who was the buzzed winner, but Max’s win (his nomination even) is not indicative of what we usually associate with the Oscars. In fact, the same year the Supporting Actor performance went to the George Chakiris’s obnoxiously loud Bernardo (a variation of Shakespeare’s Tybalt). I don’t think subtlety really begins to describe Max here. Yet, it’s not an understated performance in any way. In fact, it’s probably more strong supporting than actually leading – but that’s just opinion. Max’s performance ranks as one of my favourite decisions from Oscar and he and Tracy are both memorable here.
            
I wouldn’t say I’m smitten with Judy Garland – the actress, but few of her performances touch me as much as her turn here. It’s not wholly loved, but I don’t care. It’s a bizarre performance from her, when we think of the screen characters we associate her with. Irene Hoffman is a woman who has gone through a number of trials, in a way it’s a perfect fit for Judy who was at her lowest (it was only a few years before her suicide). She was never the greatest technical actress, but what she was able to do was connect with the sensitivity in her character. She does this here, excellently. Montgomery Clift, with just a few minutes of screen time gives another great performance and Marlene Dietrich is brilliant, as always.
Judgment at Nuremberg is a brilliant piece of cinema. It’s based on true events, and unlike so many stories of the war it deals with the aftermath – something we rarely see. The entire film permeates with a tension that’s almost overwhelming and the black and white only adds to the apprehension. Kramer did his best work here, and even though he’s rarely remembered today when we think of the greats – his brilliance is assured. Judgment at Nuremberg probably isn’t that cheerful, but it’s still an excellent piece worthy of your time. It’s #46 on my list of favourites.

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Greetings



I figure that it's morning wherever you all are. Nevertheless, Merry Christmas to you all. I've not done any Christmas blogging because I've just not been in that festive of a mood. I'm not a Scrooge or anything, but others do it better so I won't. I can't even be sure what's my favourite Christmas movie. I just know that a little lady named Frances would like to give you some Christmas wishes. So, I'll just shut up and let the music play. Ciao.
                        

Friday, November 13, 2009

The Best Supporting Actress Nominees: Favourites

I’ve been tinkering with this list for a while, so finally I’ve completed it., which marks the final category, Check out the others, if you missed.

                 

                 
Here is the list of the thirty supporting nominees that have had the most profound effect on me. These are the women that I think are best, well not quite the best...I'm not sure I understand what that word means anymore. Here are the women that I like the most. Enough.

                 
TIER THREE
30 – Glenn Close in The World According to Garp
29 – Maggie Smith in Othello
28 – Julianne Moore in Boogie Nights
27 – Natalie Portman in Closer
26 – Meg Tilly in Agnes of God
25 – Angela Lansbury in The Manchurian Candidate
24 – Kate Winslet in Iris
23 – Ruth Hussey in The Philadelphia Story
                          
TIER TWO
22 – Judi Dench in Chocolat
21 – Margaret Avery in The Color Purple
20 – Marianne Jean-Baptise in Secrets & Lies
19 – Marisa Tomei in In the Bedroom
18 – Julia Roberts in Steel Magnolias
17 – Cate Blanchett in Notes On A Scandal
16 – Oliva De Havilland in Gone With the Wind
                 

THE FINALISTS

15 – Shirley Knight in Sweet Bird of Youth
Along with Angela Lansbury above, Knight lost her chance at Oscar to Patty Duke in The Miracle Worker. All three performances were good so I can’t say that Duke’s was underserved. Knight’s performance, though in Tennessee Williams’ play is quite good. As the estranged girl friend of hero [Paul Newman] she plays a young girl Heavenly – as tongue-in-cheek as Tennessee can get, and her role though quite important to the film; is not excessively large; but she plays it well. With a team of future Oscar winners, she holds her own quite nicely. Her ‘big’ scene comes when she faces off with Ed Begley in his Oscar winning role as her father. It’s a nice, strong moment and she does well with what she’s given.
                

14 – Celeste Holm in All About Eve
This performance is often regarded as inferior, especially in comparison to the ostensibly better performances of Davis, Baxter and Sanders. However, I love this performance from Celeste Holm. She’s the first person we see in the narrative, and her expressive face is what leads us back to the memory of Eve Harrington so long ago. Celeste’s part is for the most part reactive. She watches while Margo goes crazy, while Eve changes her behaviour and as her husband dallies with the actress. And it is with that expressive face that she sells it. I love that scene in the bathroom with her and Eve, and it’s exceptionally well played. Never, do we doubt her love for Margo even though her actions could have suggested otherwise.
               
13 – Maggie Smith in Gosford Park
Maggie Smith is exceptional. That much we know. Even with those one-liners in Harry Potter she still excels. In Gosford Park she is given the perfect role for an aging actress. Her performance is hinged into the beginning and the end of the film. At the start, the absurdity of having her maid stand in the rain is sad and humorous at once; and her narcissism in shown again at the end where she laments how trying being a witness at court would be for her. And in between that he spot-on delivery of her lines is enviable; in particular those few scenes with Kristin Scott Thomas [with whom she shared an uncanny chemistry] where she changed the course of the narrative were done well. A beautiful job from her.
                 
12 – Patricia Clarkson in Pieces of April
For an actress that seems to be as ubiquitous as Patty I’m always a little bewildered at times when I realise that this is her only nomination. But then this performance is not as frivolous as it seems. The movie is enjoyable, if a bit trite but Patricia elevates her character to such a height that it’s amazing. There’s a scene that always sticks with me. It’s where she vomits in a bathroom on the road and replaces what we realise is a wig on her head. Then looking at her reflection in her mirror she gives her visage a knowing, deceptive smile. It’s a nice acting moment from her, and it’s little touches like that that make turn this character into a realistic character.
                   
11 – Helen Mirren in The Madness of King George
1994 in retrospect was quite a good year in this category. Although I was not enamoured with all the performances, it was a definite step up for the Academy from 1993. Helen Mirren’s Queen Charlotte is a Cannes’ winning performance and with reason. It is a bit of co-lead I suppose; she and Nigel Hawthorne are the driving force behind the film and she handles her role wonderfully. It’s a pity that this performance is not as remembered as it should me.
                 
10 – Judy Garland in Judgment at Nuremberg
I know that everybody in the world loves Rita Moreno’s vivacious Anita in West Side Story; but as much as I like the film and enjoy her performance I really was not gunning for her to win. I suppose that somewhere hidden there is an irony that when Judy went straight up drama she lost her Oscar to a straight up musical performance. Of course Judy has always and will always be remembered as an omnipresent musical star but this is my favourite acting performance of hers. As a pivotal witness in the Nuremberg trials there is an alarming weakness that she brings to the role which is unlike much we’ve seen her do before. Stanley Kramer handles her scenes very well and it comes off a deservedly nominated performance.
                   

9 – Dianne Wiest in Parenthood
There is something that just charms me about this movie; but more importantly there’s something that just charms me about Diane Wiest in the movie. As a single mother, who may be just a little crazy she imbues the character with so much good nature that she’s wonderful to watch. Never does it seem off, and never does it seem as if she’s trying too hard. Even in those silly moments with her daughter – it’s all done in good taste, so funny and yet so poignant. There’s just, as I said a charm about her that I can’t resist. She is a wonderful actress.
                       
8 – Joan Allen in The Crucible
As a fan of Arthur Miller I can’t say that The Crucible is my favourite play of his; but there is something amazing about the play nonetheless and the adaptation of it is able to capture the beauty of it. As Elizabeth Proctor Joan Allen towers above the cast [yes, even the talented Daniel Day Lewis]. Of course the effusiveness of her performance is owed to Miller’s original work; but there is just something outstanding about her performance that I just cannot put my hand on. It’s a pity that she had to go against my darling Binoche in 1996, a year earlier or later I could have seen her easily winning the populist fare that Oscar rewarded. And it doesn’t look as if he’ll ever get the recognition that she deserves.
                       
7 – Vanessa Redgrave in Howards End
Ruth Wilcox, more than any other character in Howards End, hovers over the film. It’s not the obvious type of hovering where a character’s death must be solved. But eventually we realise what it is, Ruth Wilcox is Howards End. At the end when Meg Schlegel finally gets the house, we can almost see the figure of Ruth smiling in heaven…and seeing that her character disappeared from screen almost two hours earlier, this is no mean feat. And that is because Vanessa Redgrave is so talented. I wonder if Merchant Ivory meant for this character to seem important. Even if he didn’t Vanessa certainly made it seem so. Her rapport with especially Emma Thompson is beautiful to watch and hers few scenes are just so well acted that there’s no doubt that her Oscar nomination was deserved.
                     
6 – Glenn Close in The Big Chill
I know that many are not as fond of this performance as I would like; but then many are not as fond of the film either. Glenn plays Sarah; one of a group of friend who meet for a weekend after the suicide of one of their friends. The group went to college and have met again after a parting of ways. The Big Chill is their story. You can click on the link to see more of what I thought of the performance; but with every thing she’s given and what is an ensemble film Glenn still manages to make Sarah seem more important. It’s a well deserved Oscar nomination.
                   
5 – Kate Winslet in Sense & Sensibility
I always felt that Kate’s first nomination [more than her most recent, obviously] was always the easiest; or should have been the easiest actually. With Jane Austen as her guide Kate played Marianne Dashwood, the eponymous ‘sensibility’ of the film’s title. She is the excitable middle Dashwood girls, who is Elizabeth Bennett of Pride & Prejduice – but with less morals. It’s a sweet performance from Kate, and a thoroughly English one. She plays well alongside Emma Thompson and even seems to make a convincing romantic connection with Alan Rickman, which ostensibly seems strange.
              

INTERNAL STRUGGLING: The Respected Women
4 – Michelle Pfeiffer in Dangerous Liaisons
Mme Tourvelle. Michelle earned her first nomination in Frear’s Dangerous Liaisons, a nomination I wish had substantiated into a win. What I love about this performance is Michelle’s use of body language, but more importantly the use of her face. The internal struggle of Tourvelle is difficult to present cinematically, and wordiness would not be true to the character, but yet we are able to understand. Clichéd perhaps, but goodness is not something that we can hear and believe, it comes from inside and just happens to shine through. Michelle’s Tourvelle lets her goodness shine through.
                   
3 – Helen Mirren in Gosford Park
I watched this movie thrice one day. Just because, I knew on each viewing I’d pick up something new. When you know what’s going on, it’s amazing how everything falls into perspective. There’s a scene early, it’s actually the first time we meet Mrs. Wilson, she’s directing Clive Owen where he should be sleeping. He tells her his name and you see the slightest trace of surprise on her face that is immediately cast off. It’s both the genius of Altman and Mirren that make me love that part. It’s so subtle, and yet so telling. Mrs Wilson’s internal struggle in this role is so palpable, and that last scene where she breaks down her in her sister’s arm is never superfluous, but as tender and poignant as it should be. Only Helen Mirren.
                         

2 – Marcia Gay Harden in Mystic River
When Celeste goes to Jimmy we are to believe that this woman loves her husband. We must think that this is not a betrayal, no soliloquy is written for her to explain, we just have the actor there. And when that actor is Marcia Gay Harden, you can be assured that we’ll understand what she’s feeling – because she’s that talented. I won’t be covetous. Two Oscars in four years might have been too much, but it wouldn’t have been unseemly. No matter how much Clint Eastwood annoys me every now and again, I will forever respect him for directing this wonderful performance. Marcia Gay Harden in what could have been nothing but turned into what’s my favourite performance of her and of the entire film.
                 

1 – Julianne Moore in The Hours
I always find it strange that I love this performance so much. Because I never question that I wanted Catherine Zeta Jones to win her Oscar, I still don’t agree with Sage and Twister when the rail about her. But still, I cannot disagree that Julianne Moore is astounding in this film. It’s the sort of performance that only gets better with age. It’s the type of performance that so many of the supporting women must do – forced to keep their feelings inside. For a film so simple, there’s that one surreal moment where Laura is about to attempt suicide and we see her bed surrounded by a murky swamp. Laura awakes with a start – a newfound intelligence. It’s a moment that shouldn’t work, in the same way that crying in the bathroom or confessing to Clarissa shouldn’t. And yet…it does work. Is it Daldry, is it Julianne? I don’t know, but it is beautiful.
                     
Whew! That was a lot of writing. Thoughts?
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...