Showing posts with label 2000. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2000. Show all posts
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Friday, January 15, 2010
2000: Year In Review
It’s no surprise that the most distant year of the last decade is also the most distant year in my memory. I probably have to do much catching up on the films released that year, so I’m going back to my original format for reviewing the years instead of drawing it out.
The Nominees
Judi Dench in Chocolat
...for taking what could be the ultimate sleepwalking performance and turning it into something that’s as funny as it is fulfilling. I know I’m alone on this one, but I find her glorious here.
...for taking what could be the ultimate sleepwalking performance and turning it into something that’s as funny as it is fulfilling. I know I’m alone on this one, but I find her glorious here.
Marcia Gay Harden in Pollock
...for taking the passionate artist and turning her into something pretty fantastic. Steals the show from Ed Harris? You bet. And that’s not easy.
...for taking the passionate artist and turning her into something pretty fantastic. Steals the show from Ed Harris? You bet. And that’s not easy.
Julie Walters in Billy Elliot
...for making her teacher role into something completely human and enjoyable. And just because she’s Julie Walters.
...for making her teacher role into something completely human and enjoyable. And just because she’s Julie Walters.
Kate Winslet in Quills
... for doing more with her eyes than many do with multitudinous lines of dialogue.
... for doing more with her eyes than many do with multitudinous lines of dialogue.
Catherine Zeta-Jones in Traffic
...for standing by her man in trueLatina fashion, and for showing the world than she could be more than Zorro’s wife.
...for standing by her man in true
Runners Up: Kate Hudson in Almost Famous, Lena Olin in Chocolat
The Nominees
Don Cheadle in Traffic
...for managing to stay in my memory even though the part isn’t that “big”, but mostly for that last scene of his.
...for managing to stay in my memory even though the part isn’t that “big”, but mostly for that last scene of his.
Benicio Del Toro in Traffic
...for every scene he’s in. Yeah, he’s that good.
...for every scene he’s in. Yeah, he’s that good.
Willem Defoe in Shadow of a Vampire
...for turning in his best work and for being typical Oscar bait at its best while still breaking all the rules.
...for turning in his best work and for being typical Oscar bait at its best while still breaking all the rules.
Albert Finney in Erin Brockovich
...for reacting toErin just as we would and for making his Ed a true person.
...for reacting to
Joaquin Phoenix in Quills
...for doing this the same year as Gladiator and for making this character into something that wasn’t annoying.
...for doing this the same year as Gladiator and for making this character into something that wasn’t annoying.
Runners Up: Aaron Eckhart in Erin Brockovich Michael Douglas in Traffic, Alfred Molina in Chocolat, Joaquin Phoenix in Gladiator
The Nominees
Joan Allen in The Contender
Juliette Binoche in Chocolat
Ellen Burstyn in Requiem for a Dream
Laura Linney in You Can Count On Me
Julia Roberts in Erin Brockovich
Runners Up: Jennifer Lopez in The Cell
What can I write about these five, they fight with 2003 for having the most distinguished set of women nominated and they got it right by my judgement.
Javier Bardem in Before Night Falls
Russell Crow in Gladiator
Ed Harris in Pollock
Mark Ruffalo in You Can Count On Me
Geoffrey Rush in Quills
Runners Up: Christian Bale in American Psycho, Jamie Bell in Billy Elliot
In such a good year for men it’s a pity that Bale, Bell and Ruffalo saw no love.
Daldry for Billy Elliot
...he earns point for this fulfilling debut and the start of an illustrious career.
...he earns point for this fulfilling debut and the start of an illustrious career.
Scott for Gladiator
...he directs it like the true epic that it is, faults and all
...he directs it like the true epic that it is, faults and all
Schanbel for Before Night Falls
...just because this could have been a generic thing...and it isn't...
...just because this could have been a generic thing...and it isn't...
Soderbergh for Erin Brockovich
...for making a biopic enjoyable, interesting and even laugh out loud funny. And for directing Julia to greatness.Soderbergh for Traffic
...he manages to make each part interesting and good and the audience never gets bogged down by all the information.Runners Up: Lasse Hallestrome for Chocolat, Kenneth Longergan for You Can Count On Me, Ang Lee for Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
Billy Elliot
...because it’s pure fun. The end.
...because it’s pure fun. The end.
Chocolat
....because I love it to excess and because it’s a fairy tale that’s still believable even when it shouldn’t be.Erin Brockovich
...for the fact that it’s the kind of biopic I can get behind but mostly because it knows what to do with its cast.Traffic
...because it used to the ensemble cast to its fullest before it became the “in” thing to do.
You Can Count On Me
...because having a sibling can be both wonderful and horrible.
...because it used to the ensemble cast to its fullest before it became the “in” thing to do.
You Can Count On Me
...because having a sibling can be both wonderful and horrible.
EVERYTHING I SAW: [Alphabetically]
102 Dalmatians [D+], Almost Famous [B], American Psycho [B], Bait [D], Bedazzled [D], Before Night Falls [B+], Big Momma’s House [F], Billy Elliot [B+], Bring It On [B], Cast Away [C+], The Cell [B-], Charlie’s Angels [B-], Chocolat [A-], The Contender [B-], Coyote Ugly [C], Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon [B], Emperor’s New Groove [D+], Erin Brockovich [A-], The Family Man [C], Gladiator [B], Gone In Sixty Seconds [D+], Hollow Man [D-], How the Grinch Stole Christmas [C+], The Kid [D+], Love & Basketball [D+], Me, Myself & Irene [C+], Meet the Parents [C], Miss Congeniality [C+], Mission Impossible [B-], Nurse Betty [C+], The Nutty Professor II [D-], O Brother Where Art Thou [C], Pollock [B], Quills [B], Remember The Titans [C], Requiem for a Dream [B], Return to Me [C+], The Road to El Dorado [C-], Romeo Must Die [B-], Scary Movie [D], Shadow of a Vampire [B-], Shaft [D+], Perfect Storm [C], Traffic [B+], What Lies Beneath [C], What Women Want [C+], The Whole Nine Yards [B], X Men [B-], You Can Count On Me [B+]
Labels:
2000,
Chocolat,
Erin Brockovich,
Gay Harden,
Julia Roberts,
Traffic
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Erin Brockovich
In my youth when I saw the Steven Soderbergh’s enviable double feature of Traffic and Erin Brockovich I cannot deny that the latter was the one that was more enjoyable. However, I was at that strange time when I believed commonness was equated with enjoyment and thus I heavily believed that Traffic was the superior of the two. Years later, I still cannot be certain if Traffic is not the better of the two – but I realise that the ostensible enjoyment one derives from Erin Brockovich belies a smart and elegant interior.
Erin Brockovich is a film that has become equated with Julia Roberts – one of the greatest stars of her time. Of course her Oscar win has become somewhat maligned today but I will not deny that as much as it seems to be a role of pure stardom Julia’s Erin is one of the strongest and most enjoyable female characters of the decade and her line-readings are more than just line readings for the sake of it. Erin is the type of character who we admire all the while noticing her lesser qualities. She’s not perfect, definitely no angel as she prances around in those stiletto heels destroying everything in her path. It’s the sort of rare character that demands a leading lady with an exceptionally strong screen presence and Julia delivers on all counts. But even though the title suggests otherwise, the film is more than just a showcase for Julia and Julia alone. You’d think that the supporting players are relegated to mere caricatures in the presence of such a woman, but you’d be wrong.
Albert Finney’s Oscar nod for his supporting turn is both baffling and satisfying. It’s a performance that is without airs and completely realistic and as Julia’s boss we leave the film with as clear an understanding of Ed as we do of Erin. Aaron Eckhart has the unenviable task of playing “wife” to Julia’s role-reversed heroine. It’s a thankless role, but he holds his own with Julia in that final scene of his reminding us that even though Erin is a hero she is far from a paragon of goodness.
Erin Brockovich is a film that has become exceedingly underrated. The script is witty without being grandiose, casted to perfection with a nice little performance by the wonderful Cherry Jones, and edited fittingly it’s an incredibly enjoyable. It doesn’t fit into our usual thoughts of a biopic, but it’s a credit to its genre. It entertains as much as it edifies and though many look back and criticise its success; it deserved the recognition it attained, including that Best Picture nomination. Here it is at #81 on my list of favourites.
Starting this week I'll be looking at 2000 in review.
Starting this week I'll be looking at 2000 in review.
Labels:
2000,
Aaron Eckhart,
Albert Finney,
Erin Brockovich,
Julia Roberts,
Soderbergh
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Billy Elliot
Stephen Daldry is lucky. He’s earned three Oscar nominations for each of his three films. I don’t think anyone has ever gone three for three in terms of direction; so regardless of your thoughts on The Reader, The Hours or Billy Elliot [The Dancer] the man has to have some modicum of talent.
Billy Elliot is the lightest of Daldry’s films but that doesn’t make it any less good than the others. I suppose the emotional weight of the story may have been lost with the recent commercialism of its Broadway adaptation, but Billy Elliot is nice little film that somehow managed to earn a few Oscar nominations for itself. It tells the story of the eponymous Billy who becomes a ballet dancer despite the obvious obstacles to this goal. Like so many films of its type, it’s not the actual story per se that makes Billy Elliot original. It’s the treatment of the story and the good dialogue and acting that make it something of a treasure.
2000 was a good film year. Coming off the embarrassment of riches that was 1999 [a tough act to follow], it had some impressive pieces. Gladiator may not have been my favourite, but it was triumph, say what you wish about Soderbergh but that one two punch of Traffic and Erin Brockovich was enviable. Chocolat knew its audience, if nothing else. And that’s not even getting into the game changers like Dancer in the Dark, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, Almost Famous and underrated gems like Before Night Falls and Quills. Still Billy Elliot, not necessarily the best of the lot, was the one with the most heart.
I always marvel at Julie Walter’s nomination. Along with Marcia Gay Harden it’s anyone’s bet what had Oscar giving them nominations. But I am glad that they did because like Gay Harden ,Julie Walters is quite effective in Billy Elliot. A throwaway role? Probably. But not any less good because of it. I can’t offer up an unbiased view of 2000’s actor line-up but it’s a pity that Jamie Bell couldn’t get an Oscar nomination, although I suppose that would be asking too much.
Billy Elliot is #94 on my list of favourites. Though I’ve never been disappointed with either of Daldry’s subsequent efforts I’d like to see him tackle a comedy again.
Were you a fan of Billy Elliot? Or do you prefer Daldry's later efforts?
Labels:
2000,
favourites,
Julie Walters,
reviews,
Stephen Daldry
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
