Not long into Black Swan Thomas Leroy, the director of a prestigious ballet company, tells us that his new performance of Swan Lake will be stripped down to the bare essentials. Creatively, the decision seems sound when you remember there’s no production as stereotypically indicative of ballet as Swan Lake; moreover, when you consider that Aronofsky’s film only has 100 minutes to give us his story. It’s an especially slight story – Nina is the prototypical driven ballerina, a girl determined to sacrifice all she can for her art, goaded to perfection by her sinister mother who is (in typical fashion) a failed ballerina (an archetype in itself). True to form, Nina’s precise over-consciousness is firmly paralleled by a lighter and more spontaneous dancer in the company whilst the director, every bit as suave and oily as you’d imagine seems to be courting every girl in the company.
Notice my constant allusions to archetypes? It is not coincidental, in the same way that nothing Aronofsky does in the film occurs with spontaneity. There’s a dual natured issue at the heart of my reaction to Black Swan that I find especially confusing. Aronofsky’s constant literal mindedness and meticulousness of execution renders the film evident as a drawing board for Nina’s own perfection (and self destructiveness). It’s his attempts to get inside the head of his lead that makes the camera movements, cinematography all decidedly internal as an indicative of Nina’s trouble. What troubles more, though, is that even as Aronofsky crafts an especially psychological drama there is a palpable divide between Nina and him, and ultimately the audience. Aronofsky surveys Nina’s “plight” – but it is from a distance and with less interest in Nina, the dancer, and more care for the blatant obviousness of the artist at the mercy of her art. By doing this, he never robs us of missing the essential point to his tale – and he knows this. Nina’s struggle isn’t a new one, Barbara Hershey is so grotesquely made-up it’s not difficult to miss the harsh severity of a character that’s almost gaudily realised, but it robs the film of a soul. Nina doesn’t develop like a true character, but travels from moments of pain and suffering to more pain and suffering, and so on. Dramatically consistent, but ultimately stifling – which, perhaps, is his intent.
I was worried about seeing Black Swan from the onset because reading the script an injudiciously long time before the release I was surprised by Aronofsky’s literalness. It’s not that the script for the film is the “problem”, but the blatant lack of subtlety is vaguely puzzling at times, it’s a true-to-form realisation of the concept of stripping it down to the bare essentials which makes you realise why any piece of art must have more than the “bare essentials” to soar. Yet, whereas the overly precise exactness doesn’t succeed as winningly in the script, it impresses more in the technical aspects. Aronofsky is an especially visual director, and film is – at its height – a visual medium, and his overemphasis on the contrast of light and dark works impressively, even when it’s too obviously emphasised – which is always.
When it comes to falling into a deluge of overexposure Black Swan is nowhere near as ingratiatingly ubiquitous as Inception was in the summer. Like that much fared piece, I’ve avoided reviews even though I’m been unable to avoid the asides about it that certain top critics have made while perusing year-end top 10 lists. I remember keenly a critic being irked that another one could be more impressed with The King’s Speech than Black Swan. I haven’t seen the former, but I was already sceptical – because there’s that palpable feeling emanating from all things Black Swan like Eva Peron, “you must love me”. Portman, especially, has gained effusive praise but I’m slightly irritated that a significant portion of the praise rendered her way takes great pains to mention her six-month long struggle to transform into Nina, which only reminds me that garish transformations are so easily misinterpreted as strong acting.

What I fond oddest, though, is that despite its overt tendencies and dedication Black Swan seems especially devoid of passion, which makes me return to my supposition that the film is a stand-in for Nina’s issues which makes me wonder in retrospect if the obvious disinterest the film has for Nina is indicative of Nina’s own slight self-loathing for herself. There’s something inspired in framing the beautiful wide-shots of dancing against the ugly images of broken toes and bruised skin – but it’s just too easy to serve it to us an excuse for perfection because in all her deluded intensity I never get the feeling of overwhelming passion that Nina should feel about the task at hand - her dancing; ironically Hershey’s stoic mother seems to suggest more passion for the dance than Nina which gives her plight a feeling of forced dedication but lacking any true impetus. And, it’s sort of how Black Swan ultimately emerges austere and mannered, and graceful and svelte even when it’s interested in the basest of emotions and the ugliest portions of dance. But, when my adrenaline races it’s not for an honest interest in the story, but evidence of Aronofsky’s obvious skill for visual manipulation – which is admirable, but not exactly emotionally moving.
B/B-
No comments:
Post a Comment